.
Feedback

Rep. Engel: With Affordable Health Act, Millions of Americans Keep Health Care Coverage

Rep Eliot Engel praised the Supreme Court decision to uphold the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act.

Congressman Eliot Engel issued the following statement after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled the Affordable Care Act was constitutional.  Rep. Engel is a senior member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Health, and a longtime supporter of the Affordable Care Act.

“I am both pleased and a little surprised to see that the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Affordable Care Act, flying in the face of conservative pressure, similar to their decision in the Arizona immigration case earlier this week.  After their partisan decisions in Bush v. Gore and Citizens United, I was not alone in my skepticism that they could avoid politics on this issue.  I am very pleased to see they upheld this law, as I was always certain of its constitutionality.

“Republicans in Congress, big corporations and Tea Party activists have been banging the drum against the Affordable Care Act since 2009, overwhelming the American people with fear mongering and misinformation.  They threw everything they had at the law, the President and Democrats in Congress in an effort to prevent health care coverage for millions of Americans.  Many Members of Congress lost their jobs in 2010 based on their support of this law and I am pleased to see that they did not fight that fight in vain.  Lessening the health care costs for our nation and providing badly-needed coverage to almost every American was something we needed to do.  Perhaps now, Republicans in the House will cease their endless attacks and pointless repeal votes and work with Democrats on the other issues facing the American people – such as creating jobs, fixing our education and immigration system, and working in a bipartisan manner to run the country.

“Americans are benefitting from the Affordable Care Act, and now the benefits will continue and expand.  In New York, 160,000 young adults have health care coverage on their parents’ plans – 3.1 million nationwide – and are now going to be able to continue regular doctor visits and have a better chance of leading healthy lives. 

“Over 254,000 people in New York received a $250 rebate to help cover prescription drug cost after they hit the so-called donut hole in 2010.  New Yorkers with Medicare have saved over $269 million on their medication since the passage of the Affordable Care Act.  In 2012, over 50,000 New Yorkers with Medicare received a 50% discount on covered brand name medications when they hit the donut hole.  That donut hole will continue to shrink until it is closed once and for all.

“In 2011, over two million New Yorkers with Medicare received free preventative services – such as mammograms and colonoscopies – or a free annual wellness visit with their doctor.  Over 888,000 New Yorkers have done so in 2012, potentially receiving care needed to prevent a deadly disease from costing them more money for future care, and putting their lives at risk.  Now, more and more New Yorkers will be able to receive care early and prevent diseases from taking hold.       Also, sick individuals who rely on their health insurance coverage to treat serious diseases no longer have lifetime caps on their coverage, and starting in 2014, cannot have annual caps placed on that coverage. 

“As of this spring, over 3300 previously uninsured New Yorkers who were locked out of coverage because of a pre-existing condition were able to be insured through a Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan.  This coverage has saved lives and kept these families from potentially falling into bankruptcy to pay for treatment needed to keep them alive.  Now these families, and others who will one day require coverage, will be able to keep paying for treatment and focus on getting better instead of worrying about finances. 

“The Affordable Care Act is now the law of the land.  I am hopeful my Republican colleagues will now work with me to improve the law, instead of trying to tear it down.  The Court did the American people a huge favor today by standing with them and focusing on the law instead of the politics.  I am hopeful this will continue in the future and other upcoming landmark court decisions will not be predicated on politics.”

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Rivertowns Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Mike June 28, 2012 at 08:12 pm
Thank you Rep Engel for your entirely partisan comment. Now, let's get down to it. How does this legislation which is essentially your imprimatur for one of the largest tax increases in our nations history, going to create more affordable healthcare and greater access to all citizens? I agree it provides more coverage to Americans, but does it really provide greater and equal access to healthcare. For example, you have great healthcare insurance provided to you by the taxpayers as a Federal member of Congress. In practical terms this means you can go to the best doctors and hospitals anywhere in the country. You can get any medicine you need with a simple phone call. Does this legislation you voted for allow me or any other citizen the same access to healthcare? Because most elected officials don't answer truthfully, I will answer for you and that us an emphatic NO! In fact, more than 1/2 the new lives are "covered" by an expanded Medicaid program that under today's ruling, states don't even need to accept. Medicaid is broke in NY- try finding a provider who will accept the very low payments. Now add more lives to that program and most likely even lower payments to providers and access to healthcare actually goes down b/c of this plan. You see, in your rush to pass this horrendous law, you only thought about coverage and not how to finance it properly and equitably. At least Rep Lowey said the law needs improvements unlike your partisan rah rah acceptance.
ThinningTheHerd June 28, 2012 at 10:01 pm
If youre expecting anything but verbiage from Engel, you will be waiting for a long long time. This guy is a perfect example of what's wrong with this country. A light weight punk who likes to hear himself talk, who's main objective is to stay clean and get elected. Expendable doesn't begin to describe this guy's worth.
Dan Seidel June 29, 2012 at 12:14 am
So what should the employee do (like a legal secretary) who earns about $50,000 per year (experience) and gets a "cadillac" health plan - one with premiums more than $10,700 per year - like Oxford, etc., and then gets TAXED, AS INCOME, ON THE PORTION OF PREMIUM OVER THE LIMIT? BUT THE EMPLOYEE DOES NOT GET THAT PREMIUM PAID AS INCOME, YET GETS TAXED ON IT? that's about $3000 of income never received, yet taxed, and FICA'ed.
Fair? more taxes on income never received for the working stiffs. That's how the middle class gets jacked by Obumma! Vote Obama again!!! jerks...
Dan Seidel June 29, 2012 at 12:17 am
maybe the answer is that the employee then takes a lesser plan and pays more out of pocket for the deductible, the 80/20 and then the co pays. Real fair!!!
Everyone wear grey and march silently to work. Metropolis 2012!!
Mike June 29, 2012 at 12:22 am
Why get any insurance? Just pay the fine.....oops I mean tax. Since there are no preexisting condition rules and you can't be turned down, get the insurance only when you need it
Hugh Marshall June 29, 2012 at 12:34 am
Crybaby.
Hugh Marshall
Bob Westerfield June 29, 2012 at 01:02 am
@Mike - hmmm like those zipcars. I bet a very large portion of the working population will look at it this way.
Dan Seidel June 29, 2012 at 01:34 am
That's my take - and my way to go. I am one of those "non users" - choice between $12,000 YRLY PLUS (goes up yrly - usually between 8-12%) or "saving" until I need it, I'm opting for saving until I need it. After I get sick, I apply and get insurance - preexisting covered.
nobrainer.
Dan Seidel June 29, 2012 at 01:40 am
my secretary would be crying, if she was still employed by me. As I could not afford the rising premiums, I told her to get another job - and she did - she preserved her benefits and salary (for now) and I preserved my income stream. Most other employees would have been fired with no other job in the wings - unemployment with COBRA and inability to pay for COBRA - tax "credits" don;t mean squat if income stream is not there to begin with.
wah wah wah! I was snookered. VOTE ROMNEY AND END THIS FARCE ALREADY!! JUSTICE ROBERTS SET REALLY BAD PRECEDENT...REALLY REALLY BAD PRECEDENT. There were 5 votes for killing the bill under the Commerce Clause. Roberts is as mixed up and makes absolutely no sense as the Qur'an. Just plain whacked out - he can't even tell us what type of tax he made - certainly Congress never called it a tax and neither does Obumma or Plugs Biden. America doomed.......
Cadeyrn June 29, 2012 at 10:20 am
Americans DO NOT want this bill. And Obama has just lost his re-election bid.
Mike June 30, 2012 at 03:25 pm
Interesting that Engel and Lowey both send out these statements and the media publish them but neither one continues the conversation by answering the questions posed or concerns raised. Could it be they just don't care or they have no cogent answers? Hey Patch editors, since you agreed to publish the partisan statements, maybe you can reach out to their respective offices for follow-up interviews and questions based upon the responses from your readership. That would be responsible journalism and a true service to the community.
Pat June 30, 2012 at 04:06 pm
What's interesting is if the obamacare bill was presented today and it was explained that it will be funded with a tax increase it wouldn't pass. Engel and Lowey wouldn't touch it with a 10 foot pole.
Walden Macnair June 30, 2012 at 05:55 pm
Pat, There is no "tax increase" There is a penalty for anyone who can afford health insurance but chooses not to buy it. Yes, you can call it a tax but if you are like most people you already have health insurance so there is no increase to you.
Let's remember that this ACA was originally endorsed by the Heritage Foundation and originally conceived by Mitt Romney. It only became distasteful when Obama touched it because as all good Conservatives know, he's got cooties.
Pat June 30, 2012 at 06:03 pm
I call it a tax and the Supreme Court calls it a tax, you'll call it whatever obama tells you to call it. Watch your tax bill in 2014 when this monstrosity takes root, until then just follow the rest of the lemmings off the cliff.
Mike June 30, 2012 at 06:07 pm
Yes, we absolutely should call it a tax because that is how SCOTUS interpreted it. They declared it Constitutional ONLY because Congress has authority to tax. We can debate the merits of the ACA and the positives and negatives of it, but I think the Dems who supported this have pulled a classic bait and switch. Do you honestly believe this law would have passed if Obama and Dems initially came out and said we will finance all this via new taxes? I think that is why many folks are frustrated with this today. In the end it does not really matter as the real decision for the future of ACA will be decided in the November elections and whether Roberts planned it or not, he put the future of this law back where it belongs- in the hands of the people.
Dan Seidel June 30, 2012 at 06:09 pm
Walden, what about if your "cadillac plan" individual rate payer plan costs more than $10,700 for the year in premiums (pretty common around here with Oxford/United Health, Aetna, etc.)? Do you know the extra premiums paid are TAXABLE to the employee/policy holder at their income tax rate? treated as general income for tax purposes. The employee who never see the extra premiums paid nonetheless gets taxed on that portion paid above the rate limit. So the incentive is to get off the "cadillac" plan" and pay more out of pocket thru co pays and higher deductibles. or pay more income tax because the good plan WAS KEPT!! gee. that's real fair, wouldn't you say?
Dan Seidel June 30, 2012 at 06:17 pm
Then there is the 3.8% sales TAX on any profit above the federal exemption for homeowners, after deducting the basis valuation. So when a long time homeowner sells his/her/their home, they get the basis, then the fed exemption ($250K for individual, $500K for marrieds) and the rest is taxed at 3.8%!! besides all the other stuff attendant to a sale. AND if you house sells for more than $1Million - you've held it long time and/or that's the value - you pay 1% sales tax in NY on anything more than $1M.
This is getting to be fun, right? Nancy Pelosi said we had to pass the bill to see what's inside - I do not like what is inside. REPEAL THIS ABOMINATION!! RECALL OBAMA!! NOBAMA IN 2012!!!
Walden Macnair June 30, 2012 at 09:43 pm
Pat, There ya go, saying things that are only half true. The taxes starting in 2012 are for “Cadillac” health-plan benefits that exceeds $10,200 for individuals or $27,500 for families (not including stand-alone vision or dental benefits)
Well I have a family and a plan and the premium is no where near 27,500.00. Stop listening to Rush and start reading the ACA.
Aidan June 30, 2012 at 09:53 pm
Of course they've disappeared. They KNOW that this bill threatens THEM both.
Dan Seidel June 30, 2012 at 11:13 pm
https://www.oxhp.com/secure/materials/brokers/ny/pos_ny_ind_rates.pdf
Oxford Liberty Plan rates for 2012: monthly: Jan-12 Feb-12 Mar-12 Apr-12 May-12 Jun-12 Individual $1,878.24 $1,900.78 $1,923.59 $1,946.67 $1,970.03 $1,993.67 Parent/Child $3,779.02 $3,824.37 $3,870.26 $3,916.70 $3,963.70 $4,011.26 Employee/Spouse* $3,756.48 $3,801.56 $3,847.18 $3,893.34 $3,940.06 $3,987.34 Family $5,775.59 $5,844.90 $5,915.04 $5,986.01 $6,057.84 $6,130.54 Walden- your plan ain't so good. I used to have Liberty - can't afford it anymore.
Dan Seidel June 30, 2012 at 11:16 pm
So by keeping a "cadillac" plan, which is only what we all USED to have, one would get traxed on the premiums after about the 5th month - 7 months of premiums taxed as income. way to kill jobs, way to kill cadillac plans - way to waste the nation's health.
Ultimately we have one insurance company - the gov't and we are all so screwed. No carrier will be able to exist and make a profit. we all die. the world depopulates and Obumma and Soros are happy.
Pat July 1, 2012 at 12:41 am
walden, embrace your Harry Potter fantasy land and keep marching in lock step with obama's agenda. Besides increases in real estate taxes to fund obamacare there are a host of new taxes that the middle class will now be paying. Stop listening to Maher look it up.
SLJ July 3, 2012 at 02:39 pm
Let's see if Engel runs on this act as a tax increase. Or will he run away from it?
Joseph Diaferia July 3, 2012 at 03:11 pm
You do have an alternative. Allow me to share one: http://diaferiaforcongress.info/
Todd Hannon August 17, 2012 at 06:07 pm
No offense Dan, but Obamacare was written based loosly on Romneycare. Romney claims that he will repeal ObamaCare, but what exactly does he want to replace it with and why does it need to be replaced at all? Couldnt we just go back to a system where the government kept its hands out of the healthcare pot. Why dont we allow the market to determine prices instead of the government. These healcare laws are not capitalism, they are socialism.
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/romney-rid-obamacare-replace-obama-170803349.html
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
loretta oleck June 12, 2013 at 12:19 pm
She is coming in from Chicago for this performance at City Winery. She is an amazing performer andRead More singer.
loretta oleck June 12, 2013 at 01:08 pm
Here's a clip of Lynne Jordan who will be performing a tribute to Nina Simone on July 2nd!Read More http://youtu.be/vWyhyBMZ7eU
Monique Avakian June 15, 2013 at 06:38 am
Thanks, Loretta, for the info -- I will try to go! And, yes, Lisa, I do play the piano -- learningRead More jazz right now! :)
Lisa Buchman (Editor) June 6, 2013 at 02:55 pm
Thanks for posting this! Hopefully someone will be looking - I'll post to Facebook as well. Let usRead More know when she has a new gig!
Donna Roses June 5, 2013 at 06:03 pm
Mina, I don't know how to respond to you so please call with questions if you are interested inRead More renting either of those weeks. 917-623-6529. Donna
Donna Roses June 12, 2013 at 07:37 am
also August 30-September 6 is available.