This post was contributed by a community member. The views expressed here are the author's own.

Health & Fitness

Rabbi Mark's Blog: Save Reynolds Field (VI)

Good people can disagree, and that’s what’s happening in Hastings. But it’s not a real disagreement, because Geo-Turf has not been straight with us. A lot of information we would need in order to make an informed decision has been skewed, misrepresented, and/or withheld. If the information had been presented fully and accurately by this company I don’t think we’d be having any disagreement at all. I really don’t.

There’s a way forward for all of us. The vote needn’t split us in two. But I do believe that we have to begin by acknowledging that the issue of Reynolds Field is not just a “team” issue, or a “school” issue, or even a “village” issue. What's playing out is here locally is a global issue, and the stakes could not be higher.     

“We can either make the solution to the climate crisis the central organizing principle of global civilization or the hostile conditions we are creating will destroy us.” - Al Gore

Find out what's happening in Rivertownswith free, real-time updates from Patch.

“There is a strong community sentiment and political will in Hastings to be more sustainable and to reduce the Village's carbon footprint. A major publicly announced goal of Board of Trustees for 2009-2010 is to be a model sustainable community… The village government, as the representative of the entire community, has a responsibility to fulfill the goals of sustainability, not only for ourselves, but also for those elsewhere whose well-being our practices affect, and for our children and those who will reside in this place after us…” - Hastings-on-Hudson Sustainability Action Plan

ISSUE NUMBER SIX: GEO-TURF IS NOT ECO-FRIENDLY

Find out what's happening in Rivertownswith free, real-time updates from Patch.

Geo-Turf is misleading us when it declares on its homepage "GeoTurf has been endorsed by the Green Energy Council for its eco-friendly products and services.”

Geo-Turf is not eco-friendly. And the so-called International “Green” Energy Council which gave Geo-Turf its “seal of approval” is a racket. According to their own website the Council sells exclusives endorsements for $100,000. (Does the FDA do that? Of course not.) For $100,000 a corporation gets a four year exclusive endorsement in their industry, a seat on the council’s board, 10 congressional meetings per year, plus many other benefits. You can see it for yourself on the council’s website

Don’t have to agree with me about climate change (though I suspect you do)? There are still plenty of other reasons to oppose Geo-Turf. For instance, pictured above is a $2 million dollar artificial turf field in Chicago which was torched, likely by fireworks. 

According to the New York Times voter sentiment is turning away from artificial turf. Irvington voted against it. How will they write the story of Hastings?

VOTE NO on October 22, and then let’s all regroup as quickly as possible after that to plan a rehabilitated Reynolds Field that works for all of us, a field in line with the values articulated in our Sustainability Action Plan, and of which we can all be proud.  

Please use the link on this page to e-mail this to your friends and neighbors. The views expressed are mine alone. But for more information I encourage you to go to SaveReynoldsField.org to learn more.



We’ve removed the ability to reply as we work to make improvements. Learn more here

The views expressed in this post are the author's own. Want to post on Patch?